Building Digital Accessibility for the future

3D holographic humanoid figure emerging from a smartphone, symbolizing digital accessibility, with glowing blue particles in a futuristic city background.

Introduction

Why Digital Accessibility matters today: a strategic, social, and regulatory priority

Digital accessibility is a central element in the design and development of online content, websites, and applications that must be usable by all people, including those with permanent or temporary disabilities. In 2025, this topic has gained further relevance, as it combines social awareness, regulatory obligations, and new growth opportunities for companies.

According to the World Health Organization, about 16% of the world’s population lives with a significant form of disability, a percentage that is increasing due to population aging and the spread of chronic diseases (WHO).

This figure highlights how essential it is to consider accessibility a core requirement already in the design phase, to avoid excluding large segments of users from access to essential information and services.

  • Disabilities may be visual, auditory, motor, or cognitive. Each of these conditions presents specific barriers if the design is not inclusive. An accessibility-oriented approach helps remove obstacles and ensure equal opportunities; for example, subtitles in video content support people with hearing difficulties and make content usable in noisy environments. Alternative texts (alt text) for images allow screen reader users to understand visual content and also contribute to search engine ranking, as engines reward clear and semantically structured content.

Investing in accessibility brings cross-cutting benefits. A well-structured semantic layout facilitates screen readers but also improves the experience on smartphones and in low-connectivity conditions, thanks to lighter and more comprehensible pages. Accessible forms that are fully navigable by keyboard help users with motor disabilities and reduce completion times for everyone, with a direct impact on completion and conversion rates.

Accessibility and usability are closely linked. Usability aims to make interaction effective and efficient for a broad audience, while accessibility extends this goal to people with specific needs. Considering the two aspects together makes it possible to design truly inclusive experiences, limit costly corrective interventions in later stages, and improve the overall quality of the digital product.

The European regulatory framework reinforces these priorities. The European Accessibility Act (EAA) requires, starting from June 2025, that websites, mobile applications, e-commerce platforms, and other digital services comply with accessibility criteria aligned with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2, the current international reference standard (Directive (EU) 2019/882). Consistent adoption of these criteria reduces the risk of non-compliance, improves technical performance, and expands brand visibility even in emerging channels, including AI-driven search engines, which tend to select and cite clear, reliable, and inclusive sources.These tools, however, have a limit: they verify the presence or absence of technical elements but do not assess the real user experience. A form may have correctly associated labels and appear “compliant” to a scanner, but if the flow is unintuitive or presents comprehension barriers, the user with disabilities is still excluded.

This is why tools must always be complemented by manual tests with screen readers, keyboard navigation, and the direct involvement of people with disabilities. This step makes it possible to identify usability barriers invisible to software.

Beyond technical tools, building internal competence is essential. Different resources are suited to different contexts:

Chapter 1

Accessibility today

Designing for everyone

Accessibility improves everyday digital experiences

Digital accessibility has become a decisive factor in the daily lives of millions of people. It guarantees access to information, services, and opportunities that until a few years ago were out of reach for those facing visual, auditory, motor, or cognitive barriers. Booking a medical appointment online, attending a remote university course, or completing a purchase on an e-commerce platform are activities that today must be designed for everyone, without exclusions.

The benefits are not limited to permanent disabilities. Increasingly, accessibility also supports temporary or situational conditions. A user who experiences reduced vision after surgery, or someone using a device in noisy or silent environments, benefits from subtitles, transcripts, and clear interfaces. These solutions, originally designed to remove specific barriers, become improvements to the overall user experience.

The year 2025 marks a turning point on the regulatory front. The European Accessibility Act (EAA) has officially entered into force, requiring companies operating in the European Union to ensure the accessibility of their digital products and services: websites, mobile applications, e-commerce platforms, electronic payment terminals, and online services must conform to the reference standards. The criteria set by the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2, published by the W3C in October 2023, now form the normative and technical basis for demonstrating compliance. WCAG are built on four core principles: content must be perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust, so that it remains accessible over time even as technologies evolve.

The four WCAG principles

Perceivable

Operable

Understandable

Robust

Information and user interface components must be presented to users in ways they can perceive.

User interface components and navigation must be operable by all users.

Content and operation must be understandable.

Content must be robust enough to be interpreted reliably by a wide range of user agents, including assistive technologies.

Make content available through more than one sense (e.g., sight and hearing).

Users should be able to interact with the site using a keyboard, mouse, or assistive tech.

Content should appear and behave in predictable ways.

Ensure compatibility with current and future technologies.

Example: Add alt text to images, captions to videos, and ensure color contrast.

Example: Make all interactive elements accessible via keyboard (e.g., tabbing through a form).

Example: Use clear language, consistent navigation, and avoid unexpected changes.

Example: Use clean HTML/CSS and follow coding best practices to support screen readers.

For companies, this is not just a matter of compliance. It means rethinking the entire digital development cycle, integrating accessibility checks into design and release, and setting up continuous testing. Tools such as Wave, Axe, or Lighthouse help identify recurring issues and monitor quality, but they are not enough on their own: they must be complemented by manual evaluations and the direct involvement of people with disabilities, to obtain realistic feedback on the user experience. Organizations that adopt this approach gain a competitive advantage, enhance their reputation, build customer loyalty, and access often overlooked markets, while reducing legal and reputational risks.

Chapter 2

How to integrate accessibility into digital projects

Integrating accessibility into a digital project means treating it as a structural requirement, not an accessory activity to be addressed afterwards. For medium to large companies, this requires a clear and cross-functional process, through collaboration among development, UX design, marketing, legal compliance, and customer service.

Initial assessment:

The starting point is a comprehensive analysis of digital platforms against international standards, based on the principles of perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust content. This phase identifies barriers, measures their impact on critical user flows, and establishes intervention priorities. Automatic tools like Wave, Axe, or Lighthouse are useful for identifying recurring errors, but they are not enough: results must be validated with manual tests and the direct involvement of people with disabilities, to collect realistic feedback on the experience.

Remediation and documentation:

Once issues have been identified, barriers are corrected at the code, design, and content levels. Compliance must be documented through an Accessibility Statement, which describes the accessibility status of the site and includes a feedback channel for users. In B2B and institutional contexts, it can also be useful to produce a VPAT (Voluntary Product Accessibility Template), a document that certifies the level of compliance with required standards, often requested in public tenders or large enterprise contracts.

Monitoring and governance:

Accessibility is an ongoing process. Every new release of a website or application can introduce regressions, so constant monitoring is required. Companies should provide for periodic updates of the Accessibility Statement and regular cycles of audits and tests, combining automated monitoring with manual checks. Governance is crucial: accessibility cannot be the sole responsibility of the IT department, but must be distributed across all teams contributing to the digital product lifecycle.

Training internal teams:

Long-term sustainability depends on the people who create and manage digital content. Providing tailored training for different roles -designers, developers, content editors, and marketers- allows accessibility to be embedded in daily processes, reducing the need for later corrective actions. Experience shows that this approach strengthens corporate culture around accessibility and makes its adoption more natural, rather than an extraordinary obligation.

Risks of non-compliance:

Ignoring the requirements of the European Accessibility Act carries tangible consequences. From June 28, 2025, EU Member States can apply financial penalties and restrict access to public tenders, in addition to reputational risks linked to excluding significant portions of the user base. For medium to large companies, the stakes involve not only the corporate website but the overall reliability of the brand and its ability to operate in regulated markets.

Optional widgets:

Some organizations choose to integrate widgets that allow users to adjust contrast, text size, or other preferences. These tools can provide additional support but do not replace technical compliance: official evaluations always assess the accessibility of the underlying code and design, disabling any overlays.

Chapter 3

Training and corporate culture

Creating an accessibility-first organization

Digital accessibility is not only a matter of code or design: it is above all a cultural issue. To make it an integral part of business strategies, every level of the organization must recognize it as a priority, from top management to operational teams.

Training strategies:

A first step is to plan training programs tailored to different roles: workshops for development teams, operational guidelines for designers, awareness sessions for marketing and communication. Experience shows that role-specific training helps integrate accessibility into daily processes, reducing the risk of it being perceived as an additional burden.

Resources and continuous learning:

It is useful to provide easily accessible resources, such as corporate checklists based on WCAG, internal repositories with practical examples, and regularly updated guidelines. For medium to large organizations, adopting e-learning platforms ensures that training also reaches new hires, maintaining consistency over time.

Practical experiences and empathy:

Simulating usage scenarios with assistive technologies (screen readers, keyboard navigation, high contrast modes) helps employees understand the obstacles users face and internalize the importance of accessibility. Direct experiences foster greater awareness compared to theoretical notions alone.

Promoting an inclusive culture:

Leadership plays a decisive role: including accessibility objectives in corporate plans and monitoring progress reinforces the message. Transparent internal communication, showing both achievements and challenges, contributes to building a shared culture. Clear corporate policies with responsibilities assigned to specific roles increase accountability and reduce the risk of dispersion.

Celebrating results and encouraging feedback:

Recognizing milestones achieved, for example by highlighting the most accessible projects or sharing success stories, motivates teams and strengthens collective commitment. At the same time, providing internal feedback channels makes it possible to identify areas for improvement and encourage constructive dialogue.

Supporting technologies:

Monitoring tools and collaborative platforms can facilitate the spread of best practices and make it easier to verify project compliance. Technology thus becomes an ally for consolidating accessibility culture over time.

Chapter 4

Tools and resources to get started

Kickstarting accessibility with the right stack

Starting an accessibility journey requires adequate tools and resources, but also the awareness that no single tool can guarantee compliance. For medium to large organizations, it is important to distinguish between technological support solutions and training pathways to consolidate internal expertise.

Automated tools that are useful for identifying recurring errors and supporting ongoing monitoring include:

  • Wave (WebAIM):
    highlights basic issues such as missing alt text or header errors.
  • Axe:
    easily integrated into DevOps pipelines, useful for continuous testing in complex projects.
  • Lighthouse (Google):
    provides an overall score and improvement suggestions.
  • Accessibility Insights (Microsoft):
    offers guided tests covering more complex scenarios, such as keyboard interaction analysis.

These tools, however, have a limit: they verify the presence or absence of technical elements but do not assess the real user experience. A form may have correctly associated labels and appear “compliant” to a scanner, but if the flow is unintuitive or presents comprehension barriers, the user with disabilities is still excluded.

This is why tools must always be complemented by manual tests with screen readers, keyboard navigation, and the direct involvement of people with disabilities. This step makes it possible to identify usability barriers invisible to software.

Beyond technical tools, building internal competence is essential. Different resources are suited to different contexts:

  • WAI (Web Accessibility Initiative, W3C): provides official guides, tutorials, and checklists based on WCAG. Ideal as a normative reference and for defining corporate policies.
  • Deque University: a specialist training platform for developers and designers, suited to technical teams needing advanced and structured pathways.
  • A11y Project: an open-source community offering practical guides and checklists. Useful for transversal roles (e.g., content editors, UX designers) requiring immediate tools.
  • E-learning platforms (Coursera, Udemy): introductory courses suitable for sensitizing non-technical departments, such as marketing or communication.
  • Structured internal programs: many medium to large companies establish an internal “academy” or repository of best practices, checklists, and examples, so teams have a shared, updated reference point.

It should be noted, however, that not all organizations have the capacity or interest to internalize the entire accessibility process. In such cases, hybrid models are possible, combining internal training with the support of external partners or specialized resources. This choice allows companies to accelerate adoption while maintaining internal control over governance and strategic objectives.

To consolidate the approach, it is useful to set up a corporate toolbox that brings together in one place:

  • Verification tools integrated into workflows
  • Internal checklists based on WCAG 2.2 standards
  • Practical guidelines for inclusive design
  • Training materials differentiated by role
  • External support channels for specific needs

In this way, accessibility becomes an integral part of daily corporate processes, while maintaining the flexibility to rely on external expertise when needed, without overburdening internal teams.

Chapter 5

Case studies of success

Adopting accessibility practices is not only a regulatory requirement but an investment that generates concrete returns. Some international examples show how digital inclusion has measurable impacts on both user experience and business outcomes.

Microsoft

Adopted an “accessibility by design” approach, integrating inclusive criteria into the development of products and platforms. Features such as the immersive reader in Office 365 and voice recognition tools have made products more usable by people with disabilities and more attractive to the education and SME markets.

BBC

Has long been a pioneer in the use of subtitles and transcripts. Today over 100% of major television programs are subtitled, an investment that has broadened the audience and improved retention for a multi-channel public, including users with hearing disabilities and people who watch content without audio.

Tesco

The British retail giant revamped its e-commerce by introducing inclusive design guidelines. The investment resulted in a measurable increase in online conversion, demonstrating that accessibility can also translate into a direct competitive advantage.

Instagram

Introduced the use of artificial intelligence for automatic generation of alternative texts for images, a feature that expands accessibility and improves the overall quality of the platform. This approach shows how technological innovation can be oriented toward inclusion and scalability.


Lessons for companies

These examples show that global players, even when not directly subject to European regulations, have chosen to invest in accessibility, integrating it into their products and services. The international trend is clear: digital inclusion is being recognized as a quality factor and a driver of innovation.

For medium to large companies, the lesson is twofold: on the one hand, regulatory compliance is now essential in Europe; on the other, the global market is moving toward accessible platforms, services, and applications. Accessibility should therefore not be seen as an obligation but as a necessary investment to remain aligned with standards that are progressively becoming the global norm.

Chapter 6

Future perspectives

Looking beyond the 2025 deadline, digital accessibility is set to evolve in parallel with technological and regulatory trends. For medium to large companies, the main challenge will no longer be simply “achieving compliance” but maintaining it and transforming it into a factor of organizational resilience.

In the coming years, two decisive directions will emerge:

Structural integration into internal processes: accessibility must be stably embedded in the digital product lifecycle, from ideation to maintenance. This means including accessibility requirements in project documents, adopting pre-optimized libraries and frameworks, planning verification in acceptance tests, and establishing clear governance with distributed responsibilities. Companies that succeed in making this a natural process will avoid high remediation costs and reduce legal and reputational risks.

Constant updating of systems and skills: standards evolve (WCAG 2.2 today, WCAG 3.0 already in development) and assistive technologies advance rapidly. Organizations will need recurring training cycles, regular audits, and a culture of continuous improvement. The human factor will be crucial: team sensitivity, combined with the direct involvement of users with disabilities, will be the best tool for detecting barriers invisible to automated systems.

This transformation is not episodic but a continuous journey. Accessibility will increasingly be perceived as a digital quality indicator, on par with security or performance, and will become part of the metrics by which customers, partners, and institutions assess an organization’s reliability.

Companies that adopt this approach will gain tangible advantages: regulatory compliance will no longer be perceived as a constraint but as a prerequisite for competitiveness. Above all, they will be seen as reliable actors in a market where innovation, social responsibility, and transparency are becoming key criteria for partner selection and customer trust.

Did you find this guide useful?
Discover how we can help you make your digital projects accessible, compliant, and competitive.